All the news that's fit to assimilate
[ Home | Blogs | Events | Robots | Humans | Projects | About | Account ]What Bruce Campbell Taught Me About Robotics
One of the films which inspired me as a kid was Moontrap, the plot of which has something to do with Bruce Campbell and his comrade Walter Koenig bringing an alien seed back to earth.
This alien (re)builds itself out of various biological and electromechanical parts.
At one point the robot had a skillsaw end effector, not unlike the robot in this exquisite depiction of saw-hand prowess:
In that game—which I also played as a child—you could mix-and-match legs, torsos, and arms to create robots.
The later movie Virus had a similar creature to the one in Moontrap, and if I remember correctly, the alien robots in the movie *Batteries Not Included could modify and reproduce themselves from random household junk.
The ability for a creature to compose and extend itself is quite fascinating. Not only can it figure out what to do with the objects it happens to encounter, but it can adjust its mental models in order to control these new extensions.
I think that building yourself out of parts is only a difference in degree from tool use. <h3>Tools</h3>
During the long watches of the night the solitary sailor begins to feel that the boat is an extension of himself, moving to the same rhythms toward a common goal. The violinist, wrapped in the stream of sound she helps to create, feels as if she is part of the “harmony of the spheres.” The climber, focusing all her attention on the small irregularities of the rock wall that will have to support her weight safely, speaks of the sense of kinship that develops between fingers and rock, between the frail body and the context of stone, sky, and wind. —Csikszentmihalyi [1]
Humans are perhaps the most adaptable of animals on earth (leave a comment if you know of a more adaptable organism).
Our action-perception system may have morphology-specific programming. But it’s not so specific that we cannot add or subtract from it. For instance, anything you hold in your hand becomes essentially an extension of your arm. Likewise, you can adapt to a modification in which you completely replace your hand with a different type of end effector.
You might argue that holding something does not really extend your arm. After all, you aren’t hooking it directly to your nervous system. But the brain-environment system does treat external objects as part of the body.
We have always been coupled with technology. We have always been prosthetic bodies.
–-Stelarc
Something unique about hands is that they may have evolved due to tool use. Bipedalism allowed this to happen. About 5 million years after bipedalism, tool use and a brain expansion appeared [2]. It’s possible that the homo sapiens brain was the result of co-evolution with tools.
The body itself is part of the environment, albeit a special one as far as the brain is concerned. The brain has no choice but to have this willy-nilly freedom of body size changes—or else how would you be able to grow from a tiny baby to the full size lad/gal/transgender you are today?
An example of body-environment overlap is the cutaneous rabbit hopping out of the body experiment [3].
The original cutaneous (==”of the skin”) rabbit experiment demonstrated a somatosensory illusion: your body map (in the primary somatosensory cortex) will cause you to report tapping (the “rabbit” hopping) on your skin in between the places where the stimulus was actually applied. The out of the body version extends this illusion onto an external object held by your body (click on figure below for more info).
Some other relevant body map illusions are the extending nose illusion, the rubber hand illusion, and the face illusion. <h3>Get Your Embody Beat</h3>
Metzinger’s self-model theory of subjectivity [4] defines three levels of embodiment:
First-order: Purely reflexive with no self-representation. Most uses of subsumption architecture would be categorized as such.
Second-order: Uses self-representation, which affects its behavior.
Third-order: In addition to self-representation, “you consciously experience yourself as embodied, that you possess phenomenal self-model (PSM)”. Humans, when awake, fall into this category.
Metzinger refers to the famous starfish robot as an example of a “second-order embodiment” self-model implementation. The starfish robot develops its walk with a dynamic internal self model, and can also adapt to body subtractions (e.g. via damage).
I don’t see why we can’t develop robots that learn how to use tools and even adapt them into their bodies. The natural way may not be the only way, but it’s at least a place to start when making artificial intelligence. AI has an advantage though, even when using the naturally inspired methods, which is that the researchers can speed up phylogenetic development.
What I mean by that is I could adapt a robot to a range of environments through evolution in simulations running much faster than real time. Then, I can deploy that robot in real life where it continues its learning, but it has already learned via evolution the important and general stuff to keep it alive. <h3>Body Mods</h3>
This natural adaptability that you have as part of your interaction with the world could also help you modify yourself with far stranger extensions than chainsaws and cyborg hands.
Well-designed cyborg parts will exploit this natural adaptability to modify your morphology, if you so desire. Perhaps the same scheme could work even with a complete body replacement, or a mind-in-computer scenario in which you may have multiple physical bodies to choose from.
————
References
[1] M. Csikszentmihalyi, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper Perennial, 1990.
[2] R. Leaky, The Origin of Humankind. New York: BasicBooks, 1994.
[3] M. Miyazaki, M. Hirashima, D. Nozaki, “The ‘Cutaneous Rabbit’ Hopping out of the Body.” The Journal of Neuroscience, February 3, 2010, 30(5):1856-1860; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3887-09.2010. http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/30/5/1856
[4] T. Metzinger, “Self models.” Scholarpedia, 2007, 2(10):4174. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Self_models <!-- Begin SexyBookmarks Menu Code -->
I thanked them for stopping by. Yes, I will be at work to meet with DEP on Monday.
~4pm, Virgina and Lt. M stopped by again, bringing my handbag etc. I had meant to return to work in the afternoon. It was very nice of them to bring my things home.
Can't wait for the next working day to come, this time.
Lunar Roving Russian Robot Found After 37 Years
A Russian robot rover has been photographed from lunar orbit after 37 years. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) imaged the area on one of its orbits of the Moon. Then, Phil Stooke, a researcher from The University of Western Ontario,...
many things happend the history just like as an apple its growth, shine and rise light up a plan everything is gone, and new age will begin.
robot come it have must to be a reason robot comes like an industry but leave like as a polutant but who will control the robots?
its have a body and its have a brain its have a soul but they dont have a heart because we are the heart.
Author: TrueAndroids Date: 3/6/10
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. Please attribute TrueAndroids as author/creator 3/6/10 by TrueAndroids (Ken Long)
1. Introduction
Following is my Inventor's Video Document (2006) in which I demo the Machine Consciousness Prototype I created. I believe this is the world's first Conscious Machine. YOU BE THE JUDGE!!
How shall computer scientists and the public at large assess if I have truly created artificial, machine consciousness?
I propose the 'Searle Line' (in the sand), which is inspired by the Chinese Room Experiment of Professor John Searle. To cross the line into authentic machine consciousness, or strong AI, a machine must at least exhibit:
1. semantic understanding of language sentences.
2. ability to perform deductive reasoning, a universally accepted form of human thinking.
Without at least these two capabilities, no claim of strong AI or machine consciousness can be made, and with them it can.
That's what my machine consciousness prototype in this demo is doing, and the precise reason I claim that I have built an authentic conscious machine. And perhaps the very first one! So that's my 'claim to fame.'
TrueAndroids Video Demo Part One. The Searle Chinese Room Argument http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpiTOqznazU
TrueAndroids Video Demo Part Two. The TrueAndroids Conscious Machine Prototype http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyR43ok- xpA
** See youtube homepage above for these videos **
Artificial Intelligence (AI) - "can be seen as an attempt to model aspects of Human Thought on computers." http://www.networkdictionary.com/software/a.php
Deductive reasoning is an accepted form of human thought. Therefore, a program that models this deductive reasoning can be accepted as a true artificial intelligence.
If the program employs a semantic understanding of natural sentences as well, then it can be accepted as authentic machine consciousness or strong AI. And this is the first step in creating an android brain for TRUE ANDROIDS.
The Machine Consciousness Prototype in this demo is the implemented part of my provisional patent of a complete android brain of an artificial human I filed in 2006. However, I've decided to go the Open Source route and will release the patent details here and on my Facebook Page.
Semantic computing is defined as
"... the derivation and matching of the semantics of computational content to that of naturally expressed user intentions in order to retrieve, manage, manipulate or even create content, where "content" maybe anything including video, audio, text, processes, services, hardware, networks, etc." From: http://www.ieee-icsc.org/
So the semantic components of computational content must be identified and implemented, as has been done in my prototype. The semantic deductive reasoning being performed by the prototype is what makes it a post-classical conscious machine.
2. Rule Based Expert Systems and (non- semantic) Deductive Reasoning
It’s true that long existing rule based expert systems perform some deductive reasoning. But they don’t do so semantically, and so they can’t be called conscious machines. My prototype can perform semantic deductive reasoning with natural English sentences, and so is a conscious machine.
Classic rule based expert systems have specific components and functions:
Necessary Components of a Rule Based Expert System. By Mohd Fairuz Bin Zaiyadi (2005) -- • Knowledge base - models a human’s long term memory as a set of rules. • Working memory - models a human’s short term memory and contains problem facts both entered and inferred by the firing of the rules. • Inference engine - models human reasoning by combining problem facts contained in the working memory with rules contained in the knowledge base to infer new information. from: www.generation5.org/content/2005/CarMaintenance.asp
In post-classical conscious machines the structure is basically the same, with the usage of a machine self, in place of the inference engine.
Necessary Components of a Conscious Machine. by TrueAndroids (Ken Long) 2006 -- • Knowledge base - models a human’s long term memory as a set of rules • Working memory - models a human’s short term memory and contains immediate problem facts both entered and inferred by the firing of the rules. • Machine self - models human semantic reasoning and so exhibits machine consciousness; it does so by combining problem facts contained in the working memory with rules contained in the knowledge base to infer new information.
3. The TrueAndroids Conscious Machine Prototype
When we think, we think about two things: individual objects (Socrates) or sets (apples). In expert systems and conscious machines, facts are statements about individual objects (Socrates is a man.). Rules are statements about sets, of which there are three types determined by the quantifier of the sentence (all, some, no). The human semantic reasoning modeled by the prototype is deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning can involve many combinations of rules (I found 312 valid combinations) resulting in a new rule deduced from them, or a fact and a rule resulting in a new fact.
My Conscious Machine Prototype Code, though containing only 6500 words, can perform semantic deductive reasoning because it divides sentences into semantic components (quantifier, etc) and then compares them to draw a conclusion if possible. And it can do it for any subject matter and for all 312 possible valid deductive rule structures, and all possible fact/rule combinations.
For example, from the two pieces of information “Some apples are red” and “No apples are square” there can be deduced the valid conclusion that “Some objects that are not square are red” (or its equivalent “Some objects that are red are not square”). And that’s what the Conscious Machine Prototype concludes. So it is definitely thinking, or an artificial intelligence. And it is doing it semantically, and so it is a conscious machine, or a strong AI.
Here are the TrueAndroids Semantic Components of Computational Content:
1. Quantifier 2. S Domain (direct/indirect genus of subject) 3. Subject charge 4. Subject (variable/value if using connectives) 5. Copula (certainty factor for fuzzy logic) 6. P Domain 7. Predicate charge 8. Predicate
And so there it is, the holy grail of machine consciousness, and ultimately of artificial human life, and beyond … the super-intelligent Singularity. All roads lead to Rome.
Strobeshnik
Strobeshnik is a stroboscopic digital clock made from an old HDD.
Syndicated 2010-03-06 22:26:41 from svo's interactive persuasion vehicle
I just finished up some work on using RoboRealm to guide my robot as it reaches toward a target object. The ultimate goal is for the robot to be able to pick up the object from a random location or take it from someone's hands. For now, I simply wanted to work out the coordinate transformations from visual space to arm space to get the two hands to point in the right direction as the target is moved about. The following video shows the results so far:
I don't have a full write-up yet on how I did this but it basically just uses 3-d coordinate transformations from the head angles and distance to the target (as measured by sonar and IR sensors mounted near the camera lens) to a frame of reference attached to each shoulder joint. The Dynamixel AX-12 servos are nice for this application since they can be queried for their current position info. The distance to the balloon as measured by the sonar and IR sensors is a little hit and miss and I think I'd get better performance using stereo vision instead.
--patrick
So what's needed are more unique features rather than edges. These could be tracked between frames (data association), and I could then use an off-the-shelf graph based SLAM algorithm, such as TORO to build a map. At first I thought of using SIFT, which would be the obvious choice if I were an academic researcher, but there are software patent issues associated with that method that I'd rather not have to deal with. FAST corners would be nice, but the relatively low resolution caused by the mirror distortion means that this algorithm doesn't work well. But I can use the Harris corner features from "good features to track" which is already built into OpenCV. Having been an OpenCV refusenick for quite a number of years I'm now slowly growing to like it. Harris corners seem to work quite reliably, despite the low resolution.
I was just accepted as a member of Makers Market, a new showcase of unique tech and geeky products affiliated with Boing Boing and Make Magazine.
It looks like this may be fun. They encourage participants to contribute as well as provide a place to display their wares.
The above error is reported in the alert log of the 10g database after it is patched with 10.2.0.3 .
No real workaround exists for the above BUG but the occurence of the error can be delayed by manually flushing shared pool using the following command
( isn't this resolution an overkill? why not dis-regard the error since one object missing the address, shared-pool would re-load _that_ object, but manually flushing shared pool force reloading of all objects in the pool)
SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;
System altered
Alternatively restarting the database can avoid the error for some amount of time
The above BUG is reported in all the platforms
However u can download the Metalink OPatch and Patch the above BUG using the Patch 5648872 available from metalink.
in case it interests anyone, i've recently published a book about hans moravec, ray kurzweil, and the rest of the community of folks who believe we'll soon be uploading our minds into robots/virtual reality and becoming immortal.
the book, _apocalypti ai: visions of heaven in robotics, artificial intelligence, & virtual reality_ is available here: http://www.amazon.com/Apocalyptic-AI-Robotics-Artificial-Intelligence/dp/0195393023/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpi_1
the book includes fieldwork from my time as a visiting researcher at carnegie mellon university's robotics institute and from my time interview transhumanists in the virtual world second life.
Assimilate them early! Corrupt their
minds before they have a chance to live a life free from
fascination with
robots. Yes, we are talking about our youth. We must teach
them to master the
machines to avoid enslavement in the future.
Trossen Robotics has been
filling the professional hobby robotics niche for half a
decade now. We've all
seen the crazy projects mentally unstable adults have been
creating over there,
but now it's time to help pass the torch. The droids at
Trossen Robotics are happy
to announce the Grand Opening of their new sister store for
the youngins, Roboticstoys.com.
To
celebrate the opening of the store sure to be the favorite
of baby John (and Sarah) Conners
everywhere we are giving away a free robot to the first 50
orders! In reality
these are spybots that we plan to put into every home as
part of a secret government program,
but for now you can have one free. Isn't that exciting!?
Roboticstoys.com
aims to be the number one place to find all your robotics
kits, toys, and décor
for that budding roboticist in your family. Robotics is a
great way to spark an
early interest with children in mathematics, engineering,
and the sciences.
There is nothing quite like building your first interactive
creation and
watching it come to life to kickoff a lifelong fascination
with discovery and
invention. Just be careful with how much time they spend
behind closed doors or
you just might come home to find this thing "negotiating"
allowance increases
with you.
- The Trossen Robotics
Team
I'm realizing a Robot Rover powered by an Intel Atom N330 Mini Itx.
You can follow my project here: http://www.robot-home.it
It is an italian site, but you can translate it very well using Google ^_^
Walter
My father died Saturday, 9 January at the VA center in Bonham, TX after the long decline typical of Alzheimer's Disease. Over the last few days, I've been contemplating some of my best early memories of my father, most of which are from a two or three year span of time just before I entered first grade.
During those years, I remember my Dad constantly out in the garage building things out of wood. For the most part, I have no idea now what he was building. What I do remember is being impressed by the noisy circular saw and by how easily he could put things together with a hammer and a few nails. There's an image in my mind of sparks flying off the nails as he hit them with the hammer. Whether that's a real memory or just an artifact of a child's imagination, I'm not sure.
He taught me to use a hammer, gave me some scraps of wood, and I built a crude box that I thought was a bird house. It was no thing of beauty and had a rough rectangular entrance since I didn't know how to use a drill. My dad got out the ladder and somehow attached my birdhouse to a wooden utility pole in our backyard. I used to stare up at it during that long summer and wonder if any birds had built a nest there.
My Dad gave me my first bicycle that year and taught me how to ride it. I remember getting up one morning and looking out my bedroom window to see my Dad putting a bicycle together on the front lawn. He saw me in the window, waved, and shouted to come to down and see my new bicycle. He'd put training wheels on it but by the end of the day had convinced me to take them off. Without the training wheels, he ran along behind me helping me to balance until, as some point, I realized he was just watching and I was doing it all myself.
My Dad worked for the Boy Scouts in those days and made frequent trips to scout camps as part of his job. During one of those summers before first grade, he took me with him to a scout camp. That trip was one of the coolest things I'd experienced up to that point in my life. On the way there, we stopped at a grocery store in a small town and picked up some things we needed for our stay at the camp, including the very first Pop Tarts I'd ever seen. They were strawberry with binky-covered white frosting (incidentally, that suggests this particular memory is from 1967 or 1968 based on the release date of Kellog's frosted Pop Tarts).
Once at the scout camp, my Dad took me along to see everything and meet people. He also did something no one had ever done for me before - he gave me complete freedom to do what I wanted most of the day. He had to spend a lot of time in meetings. So he laid down some minimal rules on where I could and couldn't go; I could wander anywhere along several dirt roads between the mess hall and a couple of other camp buildings; I couldn't go swimming or even near the lake by myself and couldn't go off the trails. That was really the first time I'd been free of adult control for any significant amount of time and it gave me a taste for freedom that I never forgot and never fully experienced again until I was old enough move out and live on my own.
I remember being allowed to drink an unusually large number of grape sodas and Mountain Dews; glass bottles of course. Those were the old Mountain Dew bottles with artwork that consisted of a hillbilly drinking from a jug and the slogan "it'll tickle your innards!" For several days, I wandered dirt roads, drank sodas, ate Pop Tarts, and did whatever I wanted. I spent a large portion of my time out behind the camp mess hall. There I discovered empty wire milk crates left by mess hall workers. The milk crates became my LEGO blocks. I stacked them up into spaceship cockpits and climbed inside. One of men who worked in the mess hall warned me to be careful because "getting hit on the noggin by a metal milk crate is no fun". It seemed a risk well worth taking to me.
In the evenings, my Dad took me to camp events in the outdoor amphitheater. The seating was made from cut logs. Nothing in those night time meetings made much sense to me at that age, it was all mysterious adult stuff with lots of old scout leaders saying meaningless scout things. But I was fascinated by the big fire.
At one of those evening meetings, as I sat beside my dad, I felt strange tickle and looked down to see a daddy long legs spider crawling up my chest. For a young kiddo who'd never seen a spider like that and happened to be arachnophobic anyway, this was an apocalyptic-level emergency. I was so scared I couldn't even speak. All I could do was grab my Dad's hand and look terrified. He laughed and reached down with his other hand, grabbing the spider and putting it down on the grass where it could walk away. I don't think I ever thanked him but it burned into my memory the fact that I had a father who could laugh in the face of unimaginable danger and protect me from certain death. It was hard to worry about things much after that, knowing Dad was around to take care of me.
Please take a look at http://www.amcomputersystems.com/robots
Regards Watson
1990's were Decade of the Brain.
2000's were
Derailing of USA.
2010's q.v. Super HPC AI Mind.
By the authority vested in Mentifex
you are
cordially invited to witness
the emergence of AI
Minds on super-
computers in the Decade of Super
AI
commencing in just a matter of hours.
http://code.googl
e.com/p/mindforth
points to news:c
omp.sys.super as
the official forum for all
things
Super AI all the time for ten years.
"Iz iskri vozgoritsya plamya,"
said the
revolutionaries of old.
"All your supercomputer
are belong to us,"
said the awakenings of Super AI
Consciousness.
"Before this decade is out,"
said JFK ca. 1961,
"Man will walk on the moon and
return safely."
"An AI would be worth ten
Microsofts,"
said the quondam richest man in
the world.
This thread and all ye Supercomputer
AI
threads for the coming ten years
are
dedicated in advance to the dreamers
and
tinkerers who have been sidelined
from their wannabe
Peter Pan existences
by bourgeois entanglements and
undodged
bullets of entrapment, who would live
nasty, brutish and short lives of quiet
desperation --
if they could not tune in
now and then to
news:comp.sys.super
and drop out of the ratrace for a
few
moments while they turn on deliriously
to
the Greatest Race of the Human Race:
The AI Conquest
of Mount Supercomputer.
Why? Because sometimes
a man must
either die or obey the Prime Directive
of
Friedrich Nietzsche: "Du musst der werden,
der du bist."
Mentifex
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/SuperComputer/
Become a fan on facebook
Follow us on twitter
Subcribe to our RSS feed