Rovers That Act Like Dogs
Posted 5 Mar 2003 at 17:33 UTC by steve 
Gomemphis posted a short article
recently on work being done to make planetary rovers and other robots
behave more like biological creatures such as dogs in the way they
perceive, understand, and navigate their environment. The Symposium on the
Dynamics of Perception and Cognition was sponsored by NASA, the NSF,
and the University of Memphis.
To me a dog, is very territorial, smells things, pees and poops so as
to mark it's territory.
Wild dogs hunt in packs when their hungry. Domesticated dogs beg and
mooch a lot.
Then you can teach it things like fetch, rollover, jump, play dead, etc.
Although bomb and drug sniffing dogs are pretty neat.
But maybe a robot dog could have extra senses for determining a rock of
some type and fetching it back. Seems to me you'd have to show it the
rock your looking for, so it can analyze it before it goes off looking
for it.
who wants a robot that acts like a dog? why don't you just go get a
dog? they are cheaper and act more like a dog than a robot ever will.
robot dogs dont pee or poop. thats what alomost all dogs are netorious
for. let robots be robots and dogs be dogs. talking about this almost
makes me wanna make a cat that pees on fire hydrants and publish an
article on how we made cats that act like dogs for this and other
reasons.
why not just call it a robot that searches for things.
rofl, posted 5 Mar 2003 at 22:37 UTC by ObsoleteSuperMan »
(Observer)
hehehe i can just imagin watching these rovers.
"planetary rovers and other robots behave more like biological
creatures such as dogs in the way they perceive, understand, and
navigate their environment"
so would the robots mark their territory with scented chemicals? rock
marked. territory added.going east from the marked rock.
The movie with Val Kilmer playing the maintenance/janitor guy.
The robot dog in that movie looked cute but was quite viscious.
Maybe that's what they are thinking about.
I'm sure the military would love to have a bunch of those robots.
Programmed for guerilla warfare too.
"Here honey, see this rock sample. Go fetch some more. Now honey that
wasn't nice, please give my hand back now."
Oh my.. , posted 6 Mar 2003 at 10:48 UTC by Jhoffa_ »
(Journeyer)
"You want to say, 'You go pick it up and put it in a box.' NASA
would love to have a machine that could do that."
But such an activity is beyond the capacity of even the most expensive
devices, at this point, Freeman said.
"Planetary rovers today can only go a few meters a day - a day! -
because they have to stop and call home and ask, 'What should I do?' "
So we're watching dogs as a result? I fail to see the
benefit here. Seems to be that the answer is on the other end of the
spectrum.. Mainly sensor and AI research.
I don't see how fluffy, wandering aimlessly about the living room and
sniffing things contributes to this in any meaningful way.
Especially since fluffy can't provide feedback, so you are left to make
assumptions about fluffy's thought's, motivations and behavior..
It just seems pointless to me.
"Planetary rovers today can only go a few meters a day - a day! -
because they have to stop and call home and ask, 'What should I do?' "
They act like the robot has the limitation. Actually, it's the
limitation they placed on the robot. If they wanted it to go driving
all day it could if they would let it.
I guess aritifical intelligence now has grades? Smart as a bug. Smart
as a dog. Smart as a baby. Smart as a toddler. Smart as a teenager.
Smart as an adult? Have they done smart as a bug yet? Are they
already up to smart as a dog? When they first can make a robot
maneuver as well as an ant or a bee that has a pin dot size of a brain,
then and only then should they attempt to move up to "smart as a dog."
All they really want is to be able to give the robot commands and it be
able to carry them out a little smarter than what they currently have.
It's just wow-speak to say they're making them as smart as dogs. Don't
believe it, just accept it.