Introduction
When it comes to online gaming, having a powerful and efficient processor is essential for a smooth and immersive gaming experience. Two popular options in the market for online gaming enthusiasts are the AMD FX-8320E and AMD FX-8320 processors. Both processors are part of the AMD FX series and offer impressive specs and performance. In this article, we will compare the AMD FX-8320E and the AMD FX-8320 to determine which one is better for online gaming.
The AMD FX-8320E is a high-performance processor with a base clock speed of 3.2 GHz and a boost clock speed of 4 GHz. It features 8 cores and 8 threads, making it ideal for multitasking and resource-intensive tasks. The processor is based on the Vishera architecture and is built on the 32nm manufacturing process. It has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 95W, which means it is power-efficient and generates less heat.
On the other hand, the AMD FX-8320 is also a powerful processor with a base clock speed of 3.5 GHz and a boost clock speed of 4 GHz. It offers the same 8 cores and 8 threads as the FX-8320E, but it is built on the 32nm manufacturing process. The TDP of the FX-8320 is also 125W, which means it consumes more power and generates more heat compared to the FX-8320E.
When it comes to gaming, both processors can handle most modern games without any issues. However, the FX-8320E may have a slight advantage in terms of power efficiency and heat generation due to its lower TDP. This can be beneficial for gamers who want to minimize power consumption and maintain lower temperatures during long gaming sessions.
In terms of multitasking and productivity, both processors offer excellent performance. With 8 cores and 8 threads, they can handle demanding tasks such as video editing, rendering, and running multiple applications simultaneously. However, the FX-8320 may have a slight edge in performance due to its higher base clock speed.
Overclocking is another important factor to consider for gamers who want to push their processors to the limit. Both the FX-8320E and FX-8320 are unlocked processors, meaning they can be overclocked to achieve higher clock speeds. However, due to its higher TDP, the FX-8320 may have better overclocking potential compared to the FX-8320E.
In terms of pricing, the FX-8320E is generally priced slightly lower than the FX-8320. This can make it a more attractive option for gamers on a budget who still want excellent gaming performance.
To sum it up, both the AMD FX-8320E and FX-8320 are powerful processors that can handle online gaming and multitasking with ease. The FX-8320E offers better power efficiency and lower heat generation, while the FX-8320 may have a slight advantage in performance. The choice ultimately comes down to your specific requirements and budget.
AMD FX-8320E: Overview and Specifications
The AMD FX-8320E is a powerful processor that offers impressive performance for online gaming and multitasking. It is part of the AMD FX series, known for its high-performing processors tailored towards gamers and power users.
The FX-8320E features 8 cores and 8 threads, allowing it to handle resource-intensive tasks with ease. With a base clock speed of 3.2 GHz and a boost clock speed of 4 GHz, it provides fast and efficient processing power. This makes it ideal for gamers who want to experience smooth gameplay and seamless multitasking.
One of the standout features of the FX-8320E is its power efficiency. With a TDP of 95W, it consumes less power compared to other processors in its class. This not only reduces electricity costs but also minimizes heat generation, resulting in a cooler and more efficient system. Gamers who enjoy long gaming sessions will appreciate the FX-8320E’s ability to maintain low temperatures even under heavy loads.
The FX-8320E is built on the 32nm manufacturing process and utilizes the Vishera architecture. While it may not be the latest architecture from AMD, it still delivers exceptional performance. Its 8 cores and 8 threads allow for smooth multitasking, ensuring that you can run multiple applications simultaneously without any slowdowns.
When it comes to gaming, the FX-8320E holds its ground against most modern titles. It can handle demanding games without any issues and provides a lag-free gaming experience. However, it is worth noting that it may not deliver the same level of performance as more high-end processors, such as those from the Ryzen series. Nevertheless, for gamers on a budget, the FX-8320E offers a great balance between performance and value.
In terms of pricing, the FX-8320E is generally more affordable compared to other processors with similar performance. This makes it an attractive choice for gamers who want to build a powerful gaming rig without breaking the bank. Whether you are a casual gamer or a dedicated enthusiast, the FX-8320E offers excellent value for your money.
To conclude, the AMD FX-8320E is a powerful and efficient processor that offers impressive performance for online gaming and multitasking. With its 8 cores, low power consumption, and budget-friendly price, it is a great choice for gamers who want a solid gaming experience without compromising on performance and efficiency.
AMD FX-8320: Overview and Specifications
The AMD FX-8320 is a powerful processor that provides excellent performance for online gaming and multitasking. It is a part of the AMD FX series, which is well-known for its high-performing processors targeted towards gamers and power users.
Equipped with 8 cores and 8 threads, the FX-8320 is capable of handling resource-intensive tasks with ease. It features a base clock speed of 3.5 GHz and a boost clock speed of 4 GHz, ensuring fast and efficient processing power. This makes it suitable for gamers who require a solid performance and the ability to multitask seamlessly.
Built on the 32nm manufacturing process, the FX-8320 utilizes the Vishera architecture. While it may not be the latest architecture from AMD, it still delivers impressive performance. The 8 cores and 8 threads allow for smooth multitasking, ensuring that users can run demanding applications without experiencing any slowdowns.
When it comes to gaming, the FX-8320 holds its ground against most modern titles. It can handle graphics-intensive games with ease, providing a smooth and immersive gaming experience. While it may not offer the same level of performance as more high-end processors, such as those from the Ryzen series, it still provides a reliable and enjoyable gaming experience.
One aspect to consider with the FX-8320 is its power consumption and heat generation. With a TDP of 125W, it consumes more power compared to the FX-8320E. This results in higher electricity costs and increased heat generation, which may necessitate better cooling solutions to maintain optimal temperatures during intense gaming sessions.
In terms of pricing, the FX-8320 is generally priced slightly higher than the FX-8320E. Although it may not be the most budget-friendly option, it still offers excellent value for the performance it delivers. Gamers who are willing to invest a bit more for better performance will find the FX-8320 to be a suitable choice.
To summarize, the AMD FX-8320 is a powerful processor that offers excellent gaming performance and multitasking capabilities. With its 8 cores, it can handle demanding tasks and provide a smooth gaming experience. Although it consumes more power and generates more heat compared to the FX-8320E, it still delivers exceptional performance for those who prioritize gaming performance above all else.
Performance Comparison: Gaming
When it comes to online gaming, the performance of your processor plays a crucial role in delivering a smooth and immersive gaming experience. Both the AMD FX-8320E and FX-8320 are capable processors that can handle most modern games. However, let’s compare their gaming performance to determine if one has an edge over the other.
In terms of clock speeds, the FX-8320E has a base clock speed of 3.2 GHz, while the FX-8320 has a slightly higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz. This slight difference may result in a marginal advantage for the FX-8320 in terms of raw processing power for gaming.
However, it’s important to note that clock speed is not the only factor that affects gaming performance. Other factors such as cache size, architecture, and efficiency also contribute to overall performance. Both processors have 8 cores and 8 threads, which allow for efficient multitasking during gaming sessions.
While the FX-8320E may have a lower TDP and power consumption, it is not expected to have a significant impact on gaming performance. Gaming is primarily GPU-intensive, and as long as the processor can handle the game’s demands without bottlenecking the GPU, both processors should provide satisfactory performance.
It’s worth mentioning that the gaming experience can be optimized by pairing these processors with a powerful graphics card. The graphics card will primarily handle the rendering and computation tasks, while the processor ensures smooth gameplay and efficient multi-threading.
In terms of overclocking potential, both the FX-8320E and FX-8320 are unlocked processors, which means you can potentially push their clock speeds even higher through overclocking. However, due to its higher TDP, the FX-8320 may have better overclocking potential compared to the FX-8320E. This can result in slightly improved gaming performance, especially in CPU-intensive games.
Ultimately, when it comes to gaming performance, the difference between the FX-8320E and FX-8320 may not be significant enough to impact the overall gaming experience. Both processors are capable of handling most modern games and deliver satisfactory performance.
To summarize, both the AMD FX-8320E and FX-8320 offer solid gaming performance. While the FX-8320 may have a slight advantage in terms of clock speed, the overall gaming experience will largely depend on the graphics card you pair with the processor. Whether you choose the FX-8320E or FX-8320, you can expect a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience.
Performance Comparison: Multitasking and Productivity
In addition to online gaming, the ability to handle multitasking and productivity tasks efficiently is crucial for many users. Let’s compare the multitasking and productivity performance of the AMD FX-8320E and FX-8320 processors to determine which one excels in these areas.
Both the FX-8320E and FX-8320 feature 8 cores and 8 threads, making them well-equipped for multitasking. With the ability to run multiple applications simultaneously, these processors offer excellent multitasking capabilities. Whether you’re editing videos, streaming content, or working on complex projects, both processors can handle the workload with relative ease.
While the processors have similar core configurations, there is a slight difference in clock speeds. The FX-8320E has a base clock speed of 3.2 GHz, while the FX-8320 has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz. This small clock speed advantage may result in slightly improved performance in single-threaded productivity tasks that rely on higher clock speeds.
When it comes to resource-intensive productivity tasks such as video editing, rendering, and running virtual machines, both processors offer impressive performance. The multitasking capabilities provided by the 8 cores and 8 threads ensure smooth and efficient execution of these tasks.
Another factor to consider is the cache size. Both the FX-8320E and FX-8320 have 8MB of L3 cache, which helps improve data access speeds and overall performance. The ample cache size allows for faster retrieval of frequently accessed data, leading to improved efficiency in multitasking and productivity-related tasks.
While the FX-8320E with its lower TDP may result in slightly better power efficiency, the impact on multitasking and productivity performance is negligible. The focus in these tasks is primarily on CPU processing power, which both processors provide in abundance.
Overclocking potential is also relevant to multitasking and productivity performance. Both processors are unlocked, allowing users to overclock them for increased performance. However, due to its higher TDP, the FX-8320 may have better overclocking potential compared to the FX-8320E. This can result in further performance gains in demanding multitasking scenarios.
In summary, both the AMD FX-8320E and FX-8320 deliver excellent multitasking and productivity performance. Their 8 cores and 8 threads offer efficient multitasking capabilities, allowing for smooth execution of resource-intensive tasks. While the FX-8320 may have a slight advantage in clock speeds and overclocking potential, both processors provide ample power for multitasking and productivity needs.
Power Consumption and Heat Generation
Power consumption and heat generation are important considerations when choosing a processor, especially for those who engage in long gaming sessions or run intensive tasks for extended periods. Let’s compare the power consumption and heat generation of the AMD FX-8320E and FX-8320 processors to assess their efficiency.
The FX-8320E is designed to be power-efficient, with a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 95W. This lower TDP means that the processor consumes less power compared to the FX-8320, which has a TDP of 125W. This can lead to reduced electricity costs and a more environmentally friendly system.
Additionally, the lower power consumption of the FX-8320E results in less heat generation. This can be especially beneficial for gamers and power users who put their systems under heavy load for extended periods. A processor that generates less heat helps to maintain lower temperatures, which aids in better overall system stability and can contribute to longer component lifespan.
On the other hand, while the FX-8320 has a higher TDP and generates more heat, it does not necessarily mean it is inefficient or problematic. The 125W TDP allows for slightly higher performance potential, but it also requires better cooling solutions to dissipate the heat effectively. Users who choose the FX-8320 should make sure they have adequate cooling measures in place, such as a capable CPU cooler and proper airflow inside the system.
When it comes to power consumption and heat generation, it’s important to consider the overall system design and power requirements. The choice of other components, such as the graphics card and power supply, can impact the overall power consumption and heat output of the system. Additionally, factors such as system ventilation and case airflow play a role in maintaining optimal temperatures.
While the power consumption and heat generation of the processor are important considerations, they should not be the sole factors determining the choice between the FX-8320E and FX-8320. It’s essential to assess the specific requirements of your system and balance it with the desired performance level.
In summary, the AMD FX-8320E offers better power efficiency and lower heat generation due to its 95W TDP. This makes it a suitable choice for users who want to minimize power consumption and maintain lower system temperatures. However, the FX-8320, with its higher TDP of 125W, offers slightly higher performance potential but requires better cooling solutions to effectively dissipate the heat. Consider your system’s overall power requirements and cooling capabilities when making the best choice for your specific needs.
Overclocking Potential
Overclocking is a common practice among gamers and enthusiasts who want to push their processors beyond their stock specifications to achieve higher performance. Both the AMD FX-8320E and FX-8320 processors are unlocked, meaning they can be overclocked to increase their clock speeds. Let’s compare their overclocking potential to see if one has an advantage over the other.
When it comes to overclocking, the FX-8320E may have some limitations due to its lower Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 95W. The lower TDP generally means there is less headroom for increasing the voltage and clock speeds without exceeding safe thermal limits. While it is still possible to achieve a noticeable overclock, the FX-8320E may not have as much overclocking headroom compared to the FX-8320.
On the other hand, the FX-8320, with its higher TDP of 125W, typically has more potential for overclocking. The higher TDP allows for better power delivery and heat dissipation, which can result in higher stable clock speeds when the processor is overclocked. With proper cooling solutions, such as an adequate CPU cooler and good case ventilation, the FX-8320 can be pushed to higher clock speeds and potentially achieve better performance gains.
It’s worth noting that the overclocking potential of any processor can vary based on silicon lottery – the natural variances in the manufacturing process. Some individual processors may overclock better than others, even within the same model. The success of your overclocking attempt may depend on factors such as the quality of your processor, the motherboard you’re using, and your ability to properly manage voltages and cooling.
To achieve a stable and safe overclock, it’s important to follow proper overclocking techniques and gradually increase the clock speeds while stress testing for stability and monitoring temperatures. Pushing a processor too far beyond its safe operating limits can result in instability, crashes, or even damage to the processor or other components.
In summary, both the AMD FX-8320E and FX-8320 are unlocked processors that offer overclocking potential. However, due to its higher TDP, the FX-8320 generally has better overclocking potential compared to the FX-8320E. With proper cooling and voltage management, the FX-8320 can achieve higher stable clock speeds and potentially deliver better performance gains. Nevertheless, the success of overclocking depends on multiple factors and can vary from processor to processor.
Price Comparison
When it comes to choosing a processor, price is often a significant factor for many users. Let’s compare the prices of the AMD FX-8320E and FX-8320 processors to assess their value for money.
Generally, the AMD FX-8320E is priced slightly lower than the FX-8320. This price difference can make the FX-8320E a more attractive option for users who are on a tighter budget or looking for an affordable processor without sacrificing too much performance. The FX-8320E offers excellent value for its level of performance, making it a cost-effective choice.
On the other hand, the FX-8320 may be priced slightly higher, but it offers slightly higher clock speeds and potentially better overclocking potential. For users who are willing to invest a bit more for a slight performance boost, the FX-8320 can still be a reasonable choice, especially for those who prioritize the highest possible performance within their budget.
It’s important to note that prices may vary depending on the region and the availability of the processors. It’s always a good idea to compare prices from different retailers or online platforms to ensure you’re getting the best deal.
When considering the price of a processor, it’s also essential to factor in the overall cost of the system. The processor is just one component, and other components such as the motherboard, graphics card, RAM, and storage also contribute to the total cost. It’s crucial to find a balance between the processor’s price and the overall system budget to create a balanced and cost-effective build.
It’s worth mentioning that while the FX-8320E may be priced lower, it still delivers excellent performance for gaming and multitasking. For users on a budget, it provides a solid foundation for a gaming rig or a productivity-focused system without compromising too much on performance.
In summary, the AMD FX-8320E is generally priced lower than the FX-8320, making it a more budget-friendly option. However, the slight price difference should be weighed against the specific requirements and the overall system budget. Both processors deliver excellent value for their respective price points, providing solid performance for gaming, multitasking, and productivity tasks.
Conclusion
After comparing the AMD FX-8320E and FX-8320 processors in terms of gaming performance, multitasking and productivity, power consumption and heat generation, overclocking potential, and price, we can draw some final thoughts.
Both the AMD FX-8320E and FX-8320 offer impressive performance for their respective price points. The FX-8320E shines in terms of power efficiency and lower heat generation, making it an attractive option for users who value energy savings and cooler system temperatures. It delivers solid gaming performance and can handle multitasking and productivity tasks with ease.
On the other hand, the FX-8320 offers slightly higher clock speeds, potentially better overclocking potential, and a slightly higher price. It remains a strong option for users who are willing to invest a bit more for a small performance boost in gaming and intensive tasks.
When choosing between the FX-8320E and FX-8320, it ultimately comes down to your specific needs, budget, and priorities. The FX-8320E is an excellent option for gamers on a tight budget or those who prioritize power efficiency, while the FX-8320 offers slightly higher performance potential for users seeking the best possible performance without compromising on budget.
Both processors deliver satisfactory performance in gaming, multitasking, and productivity tasks. Paired with a capable graphics card and other high-quality components, they can create a well-rounded system that meets the needs of gamers and power users alike.
Remember to consider factors such as the specific requirements of your system, overclocking potential, power consumption, cooling solutions, and overall budget when making your decision. It’s always a good idea to evaluate your priorities and assess which processor aligns best with your needs.
In conclusion, both the AMD FX-8320E and FX-8320 have their strengths and are solid choices for online gaming and multitasking. Choose the processor that suits your requirements and budget, and enjoy a high-performance computing experience.
