| [ Home | Comics | Robots | Humans | Projects | About | Account ] | |
Tetra2o2 is currently certified at Journeyer level.
Name: Andrew Baughns Notes: I am a robotics hobbyist. I've been interested in robotics since I was a kid, but only within the last 3 years have been actually designing and building robots. The first robot I built was with Lego Mindstorms using a java-like firmware upgrade from the RCX 2.0 microcomputer. The next and last robot I built uses a javelin stamp as the local brain of the robot but is controlled wirelessly by my desktop (or laptop computer) for more sophisticated behaviour. It uses a CAMU-CAM, an ultrasonic ranger, and two bumpers for sensors. At the moment, most of my work deals with AI software for this robot. Recent blog entries by Tetra2o2Syndication: RSS 2.0
Last night before going to bed, I was thinking about how to
create the artificial intelligence for my robot. As I
thought more about it, I seemed to be experiencing a serious
moment of doubt. So far, I have assummed without much
critical evaluation that creating a true machine
intelligence (I don't like the terms 'artificial
intelligence' because I don't think that if machines were to
become truly intelligent, there would be much use for the
prefix 'artificial'.) would be a good thing. But with the
recent articles on the Defense Department's use of
robot-like devices for warfare, I am not so certain anymore.
It seems to me that machine intelligence, especially when
such intelligence becomes sentient, would have vast
potential for abuse. One could argue that computers already
have potential for abuse (i.e., crackers and virus
spreaders) but I think this misses the point. To give
machines a high level of independent intelligence (which is
what I'm really talking about) would make them potentially
much more dangerous then computers in general because the
capabilities of most computers is limited by the skill of
the programmer. But a robot or computer with a high level
of machine intelligence might be able to do things far
beyond the expectations of the human programmer.
Sentient computers and/or robots is a serious matter. I suspect that when computers/robots become recognizably sentient, people will be afraid of them. Humans will be threatened by them, just as some were by the great chess-playing programs (e.g., Deep Blue) in the mid to late nineties. It seems not only possible, but inevitable that computers will become sentient. In fact, I think it is possible with technology we have now. The problem is one of having the right software rather than hardware. Just think of how intelligent some species of birds are. Their brains are relatively small compared to many mammals, and yet some exhibit extremely high levels of intelligence, comparable to dolphins and chimps. (See, http://www.alexfoundation.org/index2.htm). Thus, it seems that the problem with robots and computers now as far as sentience is the lack of the right programming. True, some aspects of robots such as fast visual or sound processing require shear processing power (at least the way visual software and cameras are currently built), but the capacity for logic can be programmed easily. I think that when someone figures out a way to control a robot such as Honda's ASIMO by a supercomputer, and writes the correct software, we could have a robot exhibiting sentience tomorrow. If you observe the reaction that people have toward cloning, imagine how they will react to an autonomous robot that appears to be conscious. I think they would react negatively and fearfully when they observe it acting in unanticipated and spontaneous ways, as one would expect from an entity that was really conscious. They will be forced to deal with non-human intelligence, which will, at a minimum, threaten their religious views of human special-ness and if some Skynet-like machine emerges, threaten their life.
Tonight, I hope to take the high level design for my robot
one step closer to actual code. My basic idea is to write
the software that will allow my robot to learn the spatial
layout of a room, and, given that, navigate from one point
of the room to another.
Others have certified Tetra2o2 as follows:
[ Certification disabled because you're not logged in. ] |