<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>robots.net</title>
    <link>http://robots.net/</link>
    <description>Recent robots.net articles</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Sat, 4 Jul 2009 00:23:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Robots: From Animals to Automation  </title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2874.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2874.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:12:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.robotspodcast.com/podcast/uploaded_images/robotspodcast-festo-aquajelly-aquapenguin-aquaray.jpg"&gt;&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; Over the past years the Bionic Learning&#xD;
Network, a consortium of universities, institutes and development&#xD;
companies run by German automation giant Festo, has been turning out&#xD;
impressive robotic artifacts. Festo thinks of robots like the AquaPenguin, AquaRay and AquaJelly pictured&#xD;
above as technology demonstrators that help identify bionic principles.&#xD;
These principles in turn may be applicable in their next generation of&#xD;
automation products. In the latest episode of the Robots podcast, Markus Fischer,&#xD;
head of the Bionic Learning Network project and head of Festo's&#xD;
Corporate Design explains how Festo transfers technologies from&#xD;
biomimetic research to actual products. In the second part of this&#xD;
episode Victor Zykov, very well known for his work on Resilient Introspective&#xD;
Machines with Hod&#xD;
Lipson, talks more about the role of bio-inspiration as well as his&#xD;
favorite topic, modular robots. Zykov explains his work on his&#xD;
bio-inspired Molecubes (see some previous posts), and&#xD;
tells us how Festo may use modular robots to construct the adaptable&#xD;
factories of the future. Tune&#xD;
in!&#xD;
&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EU Creates Self-Tuning Compiler</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2873.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2873.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2462/3681187497_639b26653a.jpg"&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;Robots use all kinds of embedded processors. New processors are being&#xD;
created all the time. Writing software for all those processors requires&#xD;
a compiler and the most commonly used compiler is GNU GCC, originally created by Richard&#xD;
Stallman that made the Free Software and&#xD;
Open Source&#xD;
movements possible. The trouble is, a lot of work is&#xD;
involved in optimizing a complex compiler like GCC for every new&#xD;
processor that turns up. What if we could use AI and machine learning&#xD;
techniques to do all that work? This idea was explored by a&#xD;
group of EU research organizations. The result is MILEPOST GCC&#xD;
4.4.0, the first machine learning enabled, self-tuning compiler that&#xD;
can adapt to any architecture using an iterative feedback-directed&#xD;
process. From the IBM&#xD;
press release:&#xD;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Initial IBM experiments conducted on IBM System p servers&#xD;
achieved an average 18 percent performance improvement on&#xD;
embedded-application benchmarks...it normally takes application&#xD;
developers many months to get their software running at an acceptable&#xD;
level of performance. Milepost GCC can reduce the amount of time it&#xD;
takes to reach that level by a factor of 10.&#xD;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;The diagram above compares a block diagram of the current GCC&#xD;
with MILEPOST GCC. At present MILEPOST GCC is a research compiler only&#xD;
but because it's Free Software, you can download&#xD;
MILEPOST GCC, use it, study it,&#xD;
and even modify the code if you wish. To make modification easier, the&#xD;
researchers have also created a plugin API called the Interactive&#xD;
Compilation Interface (ICI). For more on how the machine learning&#xD;
process works,&#xD;
visit the MILEPOST website. You&#xD;
can learn a lot about what's going on by reading the MILEPOST FAQ. There is&#xD;
also a mailing&#xD;
list for those who'd like to join the development project and help&#xD;
work on this new generation of intelligent self-tuning compilation&#xD;
tools.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Robots Monitor the Melting Arctic</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2872.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2872.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:41:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3613/3678964322_fcc96dc818.jpg"&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;Earlier this year NOAA warned&#xD;
that increased global warming&#xD;
was combining with natural variability in the&#xD;
Arctic and could result in an ice-free Arctic in as little as 30 years,&#xD;
rather than the end of the century as predict by earlier models. This&#xD;
has created a sense of urgency among organizations studying the changes.&#xD;
NOAA&#xD;
and NASA have combined forces with Northrop Grumman to create a&#xD;
specially modified Global Hawk UAV that will make 6 long duration&#xD;
missions over the Arctic and the Pacific ocean to collect data in&#xD;
troposphere and lower stratosphere. The Global Hawk is an autonomous&#xD;
robot that can stay aloft for 31 hours at altitudes up to 65,000 feet.&#xD;
NASA is also using a UAVSAR&#xD;
(Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar) to create highly&#xD;
detailed Arctic ice maps:&#xD;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Using these data, scientists would also be able to measure&#xD;
the speed, direction and topographic height of ice caps whose&#xD;
sub-glacial bedrock topography is already mapped &amp;ndash; thereby providing&#xD;
critical information that can be used to improve models of glacier&#xD;
mechanics.&#xD;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, Seaglider&#xD;
robots have been deployed off Greenland to make more accurate&#xD;
measurements of Arctic sea currents. Scientist believe the Arctic runoff&#xD;
is already altering the density of sea water in the Labrador Sea,&#xD;
driving critical ocean circulation that affects the global climate. We&#xD;
mentioned last month that another seaglider project&#xD;
has resulted in a new understanding of ocean circulation that should&#xD;
significantly improve the accuracy of climate models. Canada&#xD;
is also deploying two AUVs to scan the seabed to further their&#xD;
claims in the coming UN Convention that will determine which nations get&#xD;
sovereign rights to the new ocean areas forming as the Arctic melts.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senario: Pleo is Alive and Well</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2871.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2871.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:02:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2653/3675735160_8ab4083b3c.jpg"&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;We reported in April that the creator of the Pleo robot dinosaur, Ugobe, Inc., filed chapter 7&#xD;
bankruptcy, leaving the future of the Pleo in doubt. Then we got&#xD;
some good news in June when Jetta, the Chinese company who manufactured&#xD;
the Pleo robots for Ugobe, announced they had bought the rights to the&#xD;
robot and would continue building them. This left only the question of&#xD;
immediate availability. Would Pleos continue to be sold in the US? Megan&#xD;
Lawler writes:&#xD;
&lt;blockquote&gt;You will be happy to know that our beloved Pleo has been and&#xD;
still is very much available here in the U.S. thanks to consumer&#xD;
electronics and entertainment leader, Senario. We are currently&#xD;
servicing the market with our inventory. We do buy various products from&#xD;
Jetta and of course they manufactured our current inventory. Should&#xD;
Senario continue with new manufactured product, Jetta will indeed be the&#xD;
manufacturer.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;Megan goes on to say that you can buy a Pleo today at&#xD;
Botabingbotaboom.com [$299],&#xD;
Target.com&#xD;
[$349], BestBuy.com [not in online&#xD;
catalog], and, of course Amazon.com&#xD;
[$157]. The Amazon price looks pretty good but their prices fluctuate&#xD;
frequently so your mileage may vary. &#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bored Mars Robot Turns to Star Gazing</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2870.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2870.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:24:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3556/3672118457_94e6165ca0.jpg"&gt;&lt;p&gt;For those who haven't kept up with the NASA&#xD;
Mars rovers, Spirit and&#xD;
Opportunity, here's the situation. Both rovers are still going but dust&#xD;
accumulations on the solar panels have limited their power. To make&#xD;
matters worse, Spirit&#xD;
became stuck on the side of a sand dune. NASA engineers are making&#xD;
elaborate efforts to&#xD;
free the rover, including creating an exact simulation of the Martial&#xD;
soil. In the meantime, a freak wind gust has purged most of the dust&#xD;
from the robot's solar panels, giving it more power than it's had in&#xD;
years. With all that extra power and no where to go, scientists decided&#xD;
to try some astronomical observations. The first result is shown above, a&#xD;
view of the night sky from sol 1943 (June 22 Earth time). Most of what&#xD;
you see are not stars, just hot pixels. The bright streak on the left is&#xD;
Canopus. To eliminate the noise and make the stars stand out, engineers&#xD;
plan to combine multiple exposures on future attempts. They also hope to&#xD;
capture images of Earth and Venus in the twilight sky. For more see the&#xD;
detailed&#xD;
story by Nancy Atkinson in Universe Today. I've included a few other&#xD;
recent photos from Spirit after the break. For even more images visit the Spirit raw&#xD;
image repository for over 100,000 photos from the Mars rover.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Robots Sing Happy Birthday to UK Science Museum</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2869.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2869.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 19:04:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;object width="480" height="385"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/D8_-McoAriI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;showinfo=0"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/D8_-McoAriI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;showinfo=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
Peer Lawther writes, &lt;i&gt;"you kindly wrote about the BERTI robot (Another&#xD;
Breakthrough in Rock, Paper, Scissors) a few months ago; many thanks&#xD;
for doing this. We have now uploaded two follow up robotics videos, this&#xD;
time based on the work of Professor Eduardo Miranda at the Interdisplinary Centre for&#xD;
Computer Music Research at Plymouth (UK) university and the Science Museum".&lt;/i&gt; The&#xD;
first video, seen above, shows robots singing "Happy Birthday" to the&#xD;
Science Museum. The museum is 100 years old. After the break is the&#xD;
second video, and possible the more interesting one. It's shows the&#xD;
three autonomous, intelligent robots learning to sing through a process&#xD;
in which they evolve&#xD;
their own unique musical languages.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Random Robot Roundup</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2868.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2868.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:45:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>I hope it's not too soon for another roundup because our&#xD;
mailbox is overflowing. Props to Geekdad at Wired for&#xD;
including us in his list of 52 Robot&#xD;
Geeks on Twitter. Wired also posted an interesting article&#xD;
suggesting birds may&#xD;
be able to see magnetic fields thanks to some quantum mechanics&#xD;
going on in their eyes. Based on Roger&#xD;
Ebert's review, the new Transformers movie is for the birds too. He&#xD;
describes the movie as "a horrible experience of unbearable length". Add&#xD;
that to the new Terminator on the robot movies that&#xD;
suck list. On the other hand, at least one fan likes Transformers enough to&#xD;
build a full-size&#xD;
Bumble Bee in his front yard. But that pales in comparison to the full-size&#xD;
59 foot Gundam that now stands over Tokyo. John Palmisano sent us&#xD;
video of smaller combat robots&#xD;
fighting it out at RoboGames 2009. More peaceful robots were the&#xD;
subject of several&#xD;
recent 'The Future and You' podcasts featuring our friend Tom Atwood&#xD;
of Robot Magazine. Finally, Stephen&#xD;
Hsu discusses Bruce Charlton's recent essay on the question, "Why are modern scientists so&#xD;
dull?" (PDF format). Know any other robot news, gossip, or amazing&#xD;
facts we should report? Send 'em our way please. And don't&#xD;
forget to follow us on&#xD;
twitter.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cute Japanese Robot Makes Coffee</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2867.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2867.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:55:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;object width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ejROvUC-gWU&amp;rel=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;hl=ja&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ejROvUC-gWU&amp;rel=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;hl=ja&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; A little robot named Hina (meaning&#xD;
young chick) has become very popular through the Japanese video sharing&#xD;
community, Nico Nico Douga. The&#xD;
video shows a 36 centimeter tall robot modeled after a young girl,&#xD;
grinding beans and pouring ingredients to make coffee. Created by mujaki, she&#xD;
was built largely out of modified parts from KHR-2HV, a&#xD;
robot kit made by KONDO.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pololu 3pi : the 10,000 Mile Review</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2866.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2866.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:34:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3351/3182859123_c30e785092.jpg"&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;I think this review marks some kind of record for how extensively&#xD;
we've tested a hardware product. Normally, when we receive a piece of&#xD;
hardware here at robots.net, we give a brief evaluation and write a&#xD;
basic review of it. So&#xD;
when Pololu sent a 3pi robot in late&#xD;
2008, I expected to write and post&#xD;
a quick review. As it has turned out, here it is June of 2009 and the&#xD;
3pi has been more thoroughly field tested than any other robot we've&#xD;
worked with. We've had way too much fun with this little robot and by the&#xD;
time you finish reading the review, you'll probably want to buy one or&#xD;
two for yourself. Read on for all the details as well as loads of&#xD;
photos.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Forbes AI Report: Gigadeath to the Artilects!</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2865.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2865.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:25:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes has posted a huge, mixed bag of interesting articles on AI and&#xD;
robots. They're calling it their AI&#xD;
Report. David Gelernter contributes the article, "What&#xD;
Happened to Theoretical AI". There are also articles from AGI folks,&#xD;
like&#xD;
Ben Goertzel's "AI&#xD;
And What To Do About It" which offers career advice for humans&#xD;
planning to live through the singularity. Even&#xD;
more loaded with&#xD;
singularity buzzwords is The&#xD;
Coming Artilect War by Hugo de Garis where&#xD;
you can read about artilect gods, Cosmists, Terrans, and Cyborgists&#xD;
duking it out in a post singularity world:&#xD;
&lt;blockquote&gt;I see a war coming, the "Artilect War," not between the&#xD;
artilects and human beings, as in the movie Terminator, but between the&#xD;
Terrans, Cosmists and Cyborgists. This will be the worst, most&#xD;
passionate war that humanity has ever known ... There will be gigadeath&#xD;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe it's me but I keep expecting Xenu to get involved in all that&#xD;
gigadeath.&#xD;
Obviously, Hugo is as pessimistic about the singularity as Ray Kurzweil&#xD;
is optimistic. If reading singularity proselytes is more than you&#xD;
can take, there are plenty of other articles more grounded in science&#xD;
and philosophy such as The&#xD;
Ethical&#xD;
War Machine by Patrick Lin which addresses the legal and technical&#xD;
challenges of miltary robots; and Who&#xD;
Needs Humanoids by Helen Greiner who points out that when the first&#xD;
Roomba owners provided feedback, they weren't saying "I wish my Roomba&#xD;
was more human-like", they were saying "I wish my Roomba did a better&#xD;
job of cleaning the floor". Judea Pearl offers an article called "Giving&#xD;
Computers Free Will" but it turns out he believes free will is an&#xD;
illusion (as always, I recommend the more coherent explanation of free&#xD;
will offered by Daniel Dennett in Freedom&#xD;
Evolves).</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Human vs Robot Space Exploration</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2864.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2864.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:21:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3626/3650282787_06119f8a06.jpg"&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;The debate over human&#xD;
vs robot space exploration continues. The last time this issue&#xD;
made news was in 2006 with the death of long time opponent&#xD;
of human space exploration, James Van Allen. Opponents argue that the&#xD;
only purpose of space exploration is to return data to Earth, something&#xD;
they argue can be done by robots more cost effectively than by humans.&#xD;
No one seriously argues that robots should not explore space and there&#xD;
is a long history of successful robotic space&#xD;
exploration. Proponents of human exploration simply disagree that&#xD;
robots alone are sufficient. The latest dust up occurred recently with&#xD;
Stephen Hawking's&#xD;
call for Human colonies on the Moon and Mars. The point Hawking&#xD;
makes is that robotic exploration doesn't expand the human race beyond&#xD;
the planet Earth:&#xD;
&lt;blockquote&gt;"Robotic missions are much cheaper and may provide more&#xD;
scientific information, but they don't catch the public imagination in&#xD;
the same way, and they don't spread the human race into space, which I'm&#xD;
arguing should be our long-term strategy. If the human&#xD;
race is to continue for another million years, we will have to boldly go&#xD;
where no one has gone before."&#xD;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;Hawking points out that if we devote only one quarter of one percent&#xD;
of the world's GDP toward space exploration and colonization, it would&#xD;
give us a budget 20 times that currently allocated to the International&#xD;
Space Station. One problem may be NASA itself. Scientists&#xD;
within the agency itself have argued that NASA's current human space&#xD;
flight program is an expensive, misguided boondoggle. Now the Obama&#xD;
administration has intervened and may force them to drop Ares to&#xD;
work on a more sensible alternative to get humans back into space.&#xD;
Meanwhile, space robots soldier on. The Japanese Kaguya probe&#xD;
recorded it's final&#xD;
approach to a Lunar impact and the NASA&#xD;
LRO, pictured above, was successfully launched days ago and started&#xD;
it journey towards the Moon.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Random Robot Roundup</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2863.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2863.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:44:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Worried about super smart killer robots taking over the world? No need,&#xD;
says Francis&#xD;
X Govers III; claims that machines will surpass human brain&#xD;
power any time soon are "complete and utter BS". On the&#xD;
other hand, the Swirling&#xD;
Brain sent a link to the latest&#xD;
killer robot designs the Air Force is working on for urban warfare,&#xD;
such as kamikaze insect UAVs that will land&#xD;
on an enemy sniper's neck and explode. And that brings us to the&#xD;
latest news&#xD;
from DIY Drones; version 2.2 of&#xD;
ArduPilot, the open source AUV software is out. If you don't want&#xD;
your flying robot to crash, you'll also want to get all those resister&#xD;
values&#xD;
right and the ucHobby blog offers help in the form of&#xD;
a handy new online resister&#xD;
color code chart. Further afield, robots.net user montesns sent a link to&#xD;
Honda's new 3D Asimo&#xD;
website. And in the UK, the Shadow Robot Company is involved in two&#xD;
new research programs: one called HANDLE and another called PV-S&#xD;
aimed at robots for cleaning solar panels. Dr. Seth Quartey let us&#xD;
know about his website&#xD;
showcasing ads from Universities all over the world offering&#xD;
robotics academic and&#xD;
research programs. In news from beyond the Earth, robots are shaping&#xD;
up to be key players in the latest shuttle mission to the ISS, which&#xD;
also includes installation of the COLBERT&#xD;
hardware for the humans. Know any other robot news, gossip, or amazing&#xD;
facts we should report? Send 'em our way please. And don't&#xD;
forget to follow us on&#xD;
twitter. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Robots: Celebrity Robots Brought to Life</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2862.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2862.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:33:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.robotspodcast.com/podcast/uploaded_images/RobbieTheRobot.jpg"&gt;&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; Science fiction movie and television icon Robby the&#xD;
Robot from the 1956 movie The Forbidden&#xD;
Planet has entered many hearts (and Top 10 lists). The latest&#xD;
episode of the Robots podcast&#xD;
interviews Fred "Robotman"&#xD;
Barton, who restored the original Robby, and whose company is the&#xD;
exclusive manufacturer and licensee for Robby and many other well known&#xD;
movie robots. Barton specializes on life-size computerized replicas,&#xD;
including those of the original Star Wars Trilogy droids R2-D2 and C-3PO, Robot Model B9 from&#xD;
Lost in Space, Gort from The Day the Earth Stood Still, Maria from Metropolis, the Target Earth&#xD;
robot, or the T2-Endoskeleton.&#xD;
In the interview he describes his work with Robby and other robot&#xD;
collectibles and shares his experience with robots and Hollywood - tune&#xD;
in, or participate in the contest&#xD;
to win a DVD or bluray of your favorite movie robot.&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Robots.Video: A Vintage Robo Alpha Performance</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2861.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2861.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:02:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;object width="480" height="385"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qlndnwjf-2M&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;showinfo=0"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qlndnwjf-2M&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;showinfo=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;This impressive display of chaotic robotic noise is from a 1999 Detroit&#xD;
performance of experimental noise artist Government Alpha&#xD;
(performing as alter-ego ROBO-ALPHA). Government Alpha aptly describes&#xD;
itself as Yasutoshi Yoshida's "Experimental Harsh Noise" project on their&#xD;
myspace page. If you'd&#xD;
like to hear more harsh noise, check out Government&#xD;
Alpha's CDs or you might be interested in the "Extreme&#xD;
Music From Japan" compilation CD (1995) from Susan Lawly (described&#xD;
as "a very good representation of the finest noise Japan has to&#xD;
offer"). The YouTube video has&#xD;
collected a small but extreme range of comments from, &lt;i&gt;"I want to be&#xD;
a robot when I grow up"&lt;/i&gt; to &lt;i&gt;"the most ridiculous waste of human energy&#xD;
I've ever witnessed"&lt;/i&gt;. Depending on your personal proclivities, you may&#xD;
want to either increase your volume to maximum or mute it altogether&#xD;
before clicking the play button. You have been warned. Props to our&#xD;
friends at Pink&#xD;
Tentacle for bringing this noise to our attention.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can the Death of Robots Teach us about Life?</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/article/2860.html</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/article/2860.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:26:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Can robots or other forms of artificial life teach us anything about&#xD;
life and death? This question is pondered by researcher Carlos Gershenson in his&#xD;
short but interesting essay, "What Does Artificial&#xD;
Life Tell Us About Death?" (PDF format). Death occurs when an&#xD;
organism loses the particular organization that allows the process we&#xD;
call life to occur. Take a living organism, put it in a blender, and a&#xD;
few minutes later you will have exactly the same molecules but with a&#xD;
different organization. The living organism now exists only as a&#xD;
description to third person observers. Gershenson notes:&#xD;
&lt;blockquote&gt;                                                           &#xD;
When the bits&#xD;
describing the organization of the organism are erased, the only place&#xD;
where the organism prevails is in the observer. The same is for robots.&#xD;
The same is for animals. The same is for humans.&#xD;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;Some artificial life, such as digital organisms, can be&#xD;
backed up or saved and then recreated with the same organization. The&#xD;
same may be true for wet alife such as protocells. "If we can create&#xD;
again a living system with the same organization", Gershenson asks, "did&#xD;
it die in the first place?" He goes on to provide speculation on&#xD;
possible definitions of death that correspond to specific views of life.&#xD;
Robotologists will note that he fails to mention the possibility of robot&#xD;
hell or silicon heaven.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
