<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>robots.net blog for roboteq</title>
    <link>http://robots.net/person/roboteq/</link>
    <description>robots.net blog for roboteq</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:46:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 05:25:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>24 Apr 2003</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/person/roboteq/diary.html?start=2</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/person/roboteq/diary.html?start=2</guid>
      <description>The controller has been selling briskly since mid-march. 
User feedback has been phenomenal.

&lt;p&gt; More interestingly, users came up with clever suggestions, 
many of which have already been added, others are in the 
drafting board. Some examples:

&lt;p&gt; - Add an analog input so that the motors can be controlled 
using an analog joystick. Done!

&lt;p&gt; - Add means of monitoring external component temperature or 
battery voltage. Done!

&lt;p&gt; - Add position mode for creating ultra high torque Jumbo 
Servos. Done and working well!

&lt;p&gt; - Add Closed Loop speed control using tachometer feedback. 
Working!

&lt;p&gt; - Add mean of plotting in real-time on a PC the R/C 
joystick capture to monitor quality and range of received 
pulsed. Done!

&lt;p&gt; - Add way of attaching multiple controller to a single 
serial port. Coming Soon!

&lt;p&gt; The manual is now 130 pages long. The web site has been 
refreshed.

&lt;p&gt; Please come to www.roboteq.com and let me know how to make 
the controller even better.

&lt;p&gt; Cosma</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Dec 2002 08:27:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>7 Dec 2002</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/person/roboteq/diary.html?start=1</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/person/roboteq/diary.html?start=1</guid>
      <description>Thank you to the many of you who commented on Roboteq's new 
motor controller. This was very encouraging after all the 
work that went into this design.

&lt;p&gt; Some of you said that there may not be enough Amps. With 
some extra testing and sofware tweaking it will now deliver 
up to 120 controlled Amps (up from 60A in the original 
spec).

&lt;p&gt; I also thought of adding sensors for motor temperature and 
a few other improvements.

&lt;p&gt; Please come back to check it out at www.roboteq.com and let 
me know what you think. Good ideas are always welcome.

&lt;p&gt; Cosma</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:26:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>22 Nov 2002</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/person/roboteq/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/person/roboteq/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description>While this may sound like a cheap commercial, I have 
recently completed work on a motor controller to which I 
have given my best nights and week-ends for the past many 
months. See www.roboteq.com

&lt;p&gt; The project grew out of a sincere desire to do 
something "better" than anything else, particularly if one 
is interested in creating robots with more brains and AI 
capabilities.

&lt;p&gt; I am curious to hear what the experts in this forum think 
of it. Since the unit can be easily reprogrammed (even 
after is has been shipped in the field) I am also looking 
for features ideas that I could add to make it even better.

&lt;p&gt; Cheers
Cosma</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
