<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>robots.net blog for pyschodrake</title>
    <link>http://robots.net/person/pyschodrake/</link>
    <description>robots.net blog for pyschodrake</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:03:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:55:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>22 Jan 2007</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/person/pyschodrake/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/person/pyschodrake/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description>There are many problems with having no human interaction in&#xD;
firing a weapon.  One of the largest is if someone is smart,&#xD;
they can hack these robots and have them turn on those they&#xD;
are supposed to be guarding.  Another problem is that under&#xD;
certain conditions, passwords can be garbled to robot but&#xD;
clear to a human.  And third problem is that humans have&#xD;
this funny thing called intution that allows us to judge the&#xD;
intent  of a person, a robot can not do this.&#xD;
The idea of having robots on border guard is pretty smart;&#xD;
as long as they are armed with non-lethal weapons only. Use&#xD;
rubber bullets, tear gas, tranquilizers, mono directional&#xD;
white noise generators, etc. instead of bullets.  Doing this&#xD;
would be just as effective as arming the robot with a gun.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
