<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>robots.net blog for ada83</title>
    <link>http://robots.net/person/ada83/</link>
    <description>robots.net blog for ada83</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:37:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Feb 2002 06:07:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>4 Feb 2002</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/person/ada83/diary.html?start=1</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/person/ada83/diary.html?start=1</guid>
      <description>I performed both buoancy and thruster tests on a test
platform.  Both tests went extremely well.  I was surprised
by the results of each.  Based on my observations on the
thruster performance, I can reduce my power requirement.

&lt;p&gt; The reduction in the power requirement will also allow me to
reduce the overall footprint of the system which was another
point that was concerning me.  I now believe that I can fit
all of the electronics in one pressure hull.

&lt;p&gt; The Gyropoint mice came in last week (thanks
&lt;a href="http://www.robots.net/person/hudson/" &gt;hudson&lt;/a&gt; for
the post).  I bought two units.  I think they will do nicely.

&lt;p&gt; The next steps are to mount the pressure hull(s) and get
started on the electronics.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 05:16:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>21 Jan 2002</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/person/ada83/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/person/ada83/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description>Finally put my web page up.  I don't like it, but it's a 
start anyhow.

&lt;p&gt; I received my waterproof cases 
last week from Cases4Less.  I expect that I will use two 
cases for S.C.A.R.  One case will house the main batteries 
and the other case will house the main electronics.

&lt;p&gt; I need to get to work on the main processing board.  I am 
planning on basing it around the 68302.  I have a few in 
benchstock and I think they will fit the bill.  The 
communications capability that the 68302 has should offload 
most of the handling of the serial data from the 
sensor processors.  The 68302's full processing power 
can then be used to deal with the higher level functions.

&lt;p&gt; I will not be using 68302s for the sensor processor 
boards.  I have not decided on what MCU to base them.  I am 
leaning towards an AVR because of my familiarity, but I 
also would like to play 
around with an H8.  I do not plan on needing much 
horsepower for the sensor processors.  However, if the main 
processing board becomes overwhelmed, I can always do more 
pre-processing of the sensor data.

&lt;p&gt; Decisions...Decisions...</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
