Name: Matt Perring
Member since: 2006-09-27 01:58:00
Last Login: 2006-10-23 01:15:09
Notes: Interested in useful domestic robots, amoung others, such
as bionics and universal bi-pedal robots. AI is also a
defite interest, in all ways. I am also into
steppers as a better way than servos in many
applications. I am working on a first project now, which
should be finished by December.
Recent blog entries by Trilithon
16 Oct 2006 »
Having reviewed and re-reviewed my path to creating
the thing, I have determined that little or no
change in original design needs be done. Be that as
it may, I am having problems with choosing sensors,
power-patterns, and locomotion power use. Though this
robot has 24v at about 9 Ahs available, I am still
concerned with power consumption. Waste really bugs
me. Wasted power really, really bugs me.
Thus, I am pondering power feedback circuitry. I
think it is possible to pump EMF flyback into a charge
circuit for my batteries, or at least a cap to drive my
5v cicuitry. This becomes more fun as I progress, and new
challenges constantly present themselves. I have
revolutionized this robot several times, and expect newer
concept everyday. The better it becomes, the more I must
restrain myself from making it even better...lol.
I guess machines really can evolve.
Matt
12 Oct 2006 »
I think I will use different motor drivers. I think
that the UC3517 will work best as a stepper motor driver
in this app. It will deliver about 3-times the current
necessary to drive the motors, and has a simple imput
logic control.... afterall, I don't want my PIC spending
much time controlling motors. After my main processor, I
think I will use a Microchip 16F648 to control the UC3517.
Using the 648 to control subsystems simplifies
things, but could slow them down too, but I doubt there
will be a perceptable lag in performance. However, at
this stage of development, performance is not an issue.
Safety must be the primary attribute, followed by
reliability, and then performance. If attribute 1 and 2
cannot be accomplished, #3 is of little importance.
But enough of philosophy. The hardware can be
accomplished in several ways, but the above shows a simple
and totally practical way of achieving what is to be done
with this robot. I come up with new tasks for it daily.
Matt
9 Oct 2006 »
I think I have settled on a microcontroller for this
first project... a Microchip PIC 16F877. With plenty of
I/O and Risc processing, it should be adequate. Also
settled on my on-board power supply. I think I will have
12v at 2 amp hours. This isn't a very large robot, so I
think it should run for a couple hours with that, but even
so, I have plenty of room to triple that.
5 Oct 2006 (updated 5 Oct 2006 at 04:50 UTC) »
programmed a little today... looks easier than it
actually is. Sort of repulsive how large it seems, then
you realize it is simple. But then you realize it is
harder. Then you realize u=it isn't quite that simple.
Then you understand that you are talking to a machine that
just does what it is told, and then you realize it is all
just addition and negetive addition. Low-level languages
are all we need, though. High-level languages deprive us
of learning our devices. Learn the device, communicate
with it, and get it to do what it really can.
In this infancy of robotics, we have the chance to
expand and glorify this world. We need to do this in
order to bring about changes that will affect and shudder
the world. We can do this.
2 Oct 2006 »
My tiny creature now has legs. I built a couple of
circuits to drive the motors, but in research believe this
can be accomplished with a couple of ICs. I may scrap my
drivers, after experimentation, for the lighter and more
space-conserving ICs.
4 older entries...
Trilithon certified others as follows:
Others have certified Trilithon as follows:
- Botnerd certified Trilithon as Apprentice
[ Certification disabled because you're not logged in. ]