Minsky Denounces "Stupid Little Robots" Posted 14 May 2003 at 17:33 UTC by steve 
Marvin
Minsky's latest screed is making the rounds. The Wired
article seems to have been the first on scene with Minsky's
pronouncement that robot builders are wasting their time on "stupid
little robots" and that graduate students are "wasting 3 years of their
lives soldering and repairing robots, instead of making them smart." Rodney Brooks is not amused, noting that
"Marvin may have been leveling his criticism at me". For more discussion
of the controversy, see Slashdot's
coverage of the story or this Usenet
thread in which Minsky himself responds to the story. Hmmm...Isn't
this the same Marvin Minsky who
said neural networks, the Loebner competition, etc. were a waste of time?
The fact is, AI is not ready for prime time. You can't currently grab
some AI code, plug it into a robot and have anything close to human
intelligence. If you look at the current state of personal robots, you
do find that if you weed out the stupid little robots that bump into
walls, you find little else. There have been some strides made, but
it's not hard to see why people are disappointed with the state of AI
today. Sure there's robots that are preprogrammed and given enough
time can bounce around the floor long enough to vacuum mostly all the
room, but not too many that I've seen that can think about what, when
and how to vacuum. People praise the state of AI, but I think that a
lot of what Minsky said is right on and it's in a dismil state and very
few are really to the level of really working seriously with it.
The problem with AI is that it has been pursued in the wrong way. AI
work has been largely academic rather than pragmatic. As we venture
investors in Silicon Valley have learned the hard way, successful
innovation comes in relatively small increments rather than in large
revolutionary leaps. Many, if not most, failed VC investments fail
because the company bites off more than it can chew. Starting with
Stupid Little Robots and moving to more complex ones in a series of
commercial ventures will move AI along much faster than any other
approach. The task will be broken into managable steps and each step
will be funded to a far greater extent than has been the case in the
past. The commerical success of Roomba, despite the derogatory
comments of Minsky and others, is very good news for AI and robotics in
general.
|