US Olympic Comittee vs RobolympicsPosted 25 Nov 2003 at 15:10 UTC by steve 
According
to Boing Boing, the US Olympic
Comittee is not pleased with the name chosen by The Robotics Society of
America (RSA) for their latest robot competition. The comittee sent
a cease-and-desist order to the RSA concerning the Robolympics event planned for
March of 2004. This seems odd considering the name Robolympics has been
used by other robot
events for quite a few years and no one seems to have noticed, much
less sued over it.
With atheletes pumping themselves full of drugs and depending on
technology to train them, and since it doen't seem to be true
competition anymore just a robotic system of paid judges, it's no
wonder the US Olympic Committee would want to secure the
name "robolympic" for themselves. Also, wasn't Arnold Swartzenegger a
robolympian? Apparently this sillyness of drugs and money has even
created a new hyper overactive symbotic robo creature called the robo-
lympic-lawyers. This phenomon has happened to other industries too.
Ex: Music, Video, even Garage Door Openers.
This might be the best publicity stunt ever, I mean what, are they going
to sue the ancient Greek authors of every myth that talks about the
Olympics too? And I am especially impressed in the fact that if the
ROBOlypmics are athletic events, then my robots are getting more
exercise then I am.
The group with the most money wins.
If you can't afford the lawyers, then you have to C&D.
So has anyone..., posted 26 Nov 2003 at 14:27 UTC by earlwb »
(Master)
Copyrighted or patented the "robot" or "robotics" word yet?
I suspect we're violating someone's copyright, patent or trademark
everytime we use the term.
I wonder if they've sued special olympics too?
They were sued and they settled by "licensing" the term.
I agree its good free publicity. The event is a lot of fun generally.
|